Presto Geosystems Menu
Google Translate

Porous Pavements Myth Buster: Winter Durability

Written By: Bill Handlos, P.E.

Properly designed porous pavement systems will not be damaged by the dynamics of freeze-thaw cycles.

For decades, civil engineering roadway designers have been trained to use positive drainage, crack sealing, and sealcoating to keep the area under pavement dry. The prevailing mentality was to use a well-graded, tightly compacted base under impervious concrete or asphalt wearing surfaces. When water gets between the well-graded base and the impervious surface, frost conditions would lift pavements, weaken the base structure, create potholes and, in general, wreak havoc with the life of the pavement.

  

So, it is not surprising that age-old tenets related to moisture, seepage, and freeze-thaw cycles get mistakenly applied to porous pavement systems.

What makes well-designed porous pavement cross-sections so resistant to the power of freezing and expanding water? The answer is space. Poorly graded crushed aggregate offers up to a 40% void ratio, which gives water a place to move and expand upon freezing, and a network of pathways to drain.

High void ratio systems allow the Earth’s natural warmth to move up from below the frost line into and through the open-air system just as water and ice-melt move through the system. If the water can’t permeate into the ground and becomes trapped in the open-graded base system, the voids allow expansion of the water as it forms into ice.

How Freeze-Thaw Affects Porous Pavement

There is more than one freeze type. There are dry freeze and hard dry freeze conditions that describe regions with low precipitation and multiple freeze-thaw cycles or only one or two freeze cycles, respectively. Neither of these freeze types challenges porous pavement systems because they lack moisture.

There are wet freeze regions having 15+ freeze-thaw cycles that require 6 to 12 inches of open-graded base course to safely allow expansion of the water that percolates and drains through the pavement and base throughout the cycles.

Then there is the more challenging hard wet freeze. This is the condition described by areas that have moderate to high precipitation combined with a frost depth that develops over several months. The National Ready Mixed Concrete Association offers a solid set of recommendations defining open-graded base course depth and the porous pavement depth, based on 65% of the maximum frost depth for the area. An area that gets 24 inches of frost depth should design for a 16-inch total pervious cross-section. The 16 inches includes the porous pavement, the open-graded base course, and any pervious subbase.

 

Concerns with freeze-thaw negatively affecting the performance of porous pavements are understandable but simply a myth. Because of their high void space and ability to allow expansion of water to ice, freeze-thaw cycles have little effect on porous pavements.

 

You can have all of the benefits of porous pavements with the comfort of knowing that freeze-thaw cycles will not damage your porous pavement.

For more information on porous pavements, visit our web page: Porous Pavements.

For more information on porous pavements, visit our web page: Porous Pavements.

 

Porous Pavements Myth Buster: Winter Maintenance

Winter Maintenance for Porous & Pervious Pavements

Porous pavement systems are a great way to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff on your site and incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) practices. One of the simplest ways of creating a porous pavement area is to confine unbound aggregate in a rigid paving unit such as the GEOPAVE® Aggregate Porous Paver. The GEOPAVE system is similar to pervious concrete and porous asphalt solutions, but is usually both less expensive and easier to install.

Porous Pavements Are Difficult to Maintain in Winter Weather Conditions.

 

NOT TRUE!

The GEOPAVE Gravel Pavers are easy to maintain, and requires no special equipment. GEOPAVE parking lots or low volume roadways can be maintained in much the same way as a regular concrete or asphalt surface.

An unbound aggregate system has many maintenance benefits over other porous pavement systems. Look at the table below and you’ll see how the GEOPAVE system beats pervious concrete and porous asphalt every time.

 

 


(Click Chart to Zoom)

 

The GEOPAVE rigid porous pavement system is comparable to standard paving materials, and a cut above other porous pavement systems. GEOPAVE systems have all of the benefits of hard surface porous pavements—fast infiltration, reduced runoff, no traffic restrictions—with a safer winter surface, much lower cost, and none of the maintenance hardships.

For more information on porous pavements, visit our web page: GEOPAVE Permeable Gravel Pavers

 


 

Railroad ballast performance improvement using GEOWEB® Geocells

Each year railroads must allocate a significant portion of their capital and maintenance budget toward the creation and upkeep of high-quality ballast layers. Enduring, well-designed ballast is quite literally the foundation on which a successful rail line operates. With ballooning rail traffic carrying heavier loads than ever, GEOWEB cellular confinement (geocell) effectively takes the pressure off critical ballast systems.

Oregon State University (OSU) recently performed state-of-the-art, three-dimensional dynamic Finite Element modeling to analyze the reinforcing benefit of GEOWEB geocells in railway applications. Completed in cooperation with the University of Kansas (KU), who simultaneously performed a testing program of Geocell-reinforced ballast placed over weak subgrade.

The digital modeling results were reinforced by the laboratory tests and showed a significant decrease in settlement of the railway ballast when GEOWEB confinement was used. Using the GEOWEB system not only decreased settlement but also reduced pressure on point-to-point aggregate load transfer contact. This resulted in less damage to ballast aggregate particles leading to less progressive deformation and longer maintenance frequencies of the entire ballast embankment. In short, more cycles mean less track down-time for maintenance.

The research results were clear. The benefits of applying GEOWEB Geocell confinement for reinforcement of real ballast over weak subgrades includes:

  • Significant decrease in settlement of the railway ballast. GEOWEB confinement influence reduced settlement by to up 50% under heavy freight loadings over weak sub grades.
  • Decrease in subgrade interface pressure by nearly 50% for weak subgrades. The decreased pressure in subgrade results in lower subgrade settlements.
  • Increase in ballast resiliency after many cycles—resulting in decreased rate of cyclic settlement.
  • Decrease in lateral heave and movement of the ballast material.
  • Redistribution of vertical stresses on the subgrade—resulting in higher shear strength and reduction in plastic deformation.
  • For the largest loading conditions used in the analysis, the strains in the GEOWEB geocell were low (less than 1%) and within the elastic range for typical geosynthetic materials. The maximum tensile strains were localized at the bottom corners of the GEOWEB cells, illustrating the importance of adequately durable seams.
  • Strains in the GEOWEB ballast layer were low (less than 1%) even under heavy, freight loadings over very soft sub grades. Stress concentrations were found at the seams, highlighting the importance of GEOWEB seam strength during loading condition.

A Better Built Ballast

The benefits of GEOWEB confined ballast are substantiated through rigorous testing. Conventional ballast reinforcing materials (eg geogrids, Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)) do not have the strengthening attributes that GEOWEB geocells can provide, especially in soft subgrades. Building a more stable ballast layer with less settlement, higher shear strength, and less maintenance requirements is possible when built with GEOWEB geocells.

For more information, see https://www.prestogeo.com/applications/railroad/aar-ttci-performance-tested/.
Request an on-site technical presentation: https://www.prestogeo.com/lunch-and-learn/

Why Geocells Outperform Geogrids for Road Construction

Written By: Bill Handlos, PE, Director of Presto Geosystems

Geocells (cellular confinement) offer a more effective and practical 3D design solution to load support challenges than multilayered 2D geogrid efforts. Geocells transfer applied loads instantaneously, delivering practical soil stabilization in a product that is fast and easy to install.

Blog: Geogrids Product      Blog: GEOWEB Geocells Unpaved Roads

How do geogrids work?

Geogrids rely on rutting, displacement and lateral movement of the road material to activate the load support reaction of the product. As shown below, failure of the driving surface must occur before the geogrid reacts. As a result, rutting and soil displacement is a prerequisite reality to the system. Since the geogrid is two-dimensional, material not located directly within the plane occupied by the geogrid is free to move, shift and displace.

Blog: DiagramIt is essential that geogrids are placed in a flat or a pre-tensioned manner—but that is not practical in a construction environment. It is common to see geogrids unrolled over a prepared grade with an undulating surface. As aggregate is placed over the top of the geogrid, the material kinks and waves, further warping the 2D plane. The geogrid is rarely pulled tight during installation which does not allow full tension under load.

 

 

Geogrids are difficult to install in soft subgrades

In cases where subgrade is particularly poor, over-saturated, or already damaged by rutting, geogrids are even more difficult to place flat and tight as recommended. Soft subbase does not support medium or heavy construction equipment to place and spread the base layer over the geogrid without deforming the geogrid even further. The overall deformation creates an uneven geogrid layer that is poorly suited to function as intended.

Often, geogrid manufacturers recommend two, or even three layers of geogrids to create a stiffened aggregate cross-section. This approach improves load support performance of the geogrids, but is time-intensive, as each layer must be unfurled, covered and compacted separately. Cost of installation and materials double and triple with the additional layers.

How do geocells work?

Geocells are 3D structures that utilize the cell hoop strength, passive earth pressures, and particle confinement to create a stiff mattress layer that resists wheel loads immediately upon impact and without the partial driving surface failure required by geogrids. Load induced stresses are transferred from the infill particles to the cell wall and counteracted by hoop resistance and passive resistance of adjacent cells.

Blog: GEOWEB Geocell Load Support Diagram

Workers expand geocells over the subbase quickly and easily and it is not critical that the geocells be pre-tensioned or placed perfectly on-grade. Loaders, bulldozers and bobcats are employed to fill the geocells. Loaded dump trucks can back over ‘just-filled’ geocells with no damage to the product and no effect on the performance of the material.

Unlike geogrids, geocells are effective with a wide variety of infill, and are not limited to the high quality aggregate required for geogrids. Sand, fine aggregate, gravel or breaker run, all see their properties enhanced by the strength of high density polyethylene (HDPE) geocells. The ability to use on-site infill or locally available materials can yield increased savings to the project.

Geocells are ideal for installation over soft soils

No equipment is necessary to expand geocell sections, so they can be placed over the softest of subbases and low-pressure equipment is not required to infill the cells. Simply back up full-size loaded dump trucks, empty the payload and spread the granular material in and over the geocell.

Geocells Proven Performance

Geocells have been successfully improving road life of paved and unpaved highways, access roads and work platforms for 40 years. Since the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) co-developed the technology in partnership with Presto Products, thousands of GEOWEB® geocell load support projects have saved millions of dollars in construction costs and provided three-dimensional stabilization simply not available with the use of traditional geogrids. Browse our project case studies, photos and videos here.

Request an on-site technical presentation to learn more about the GEOWEB® Geocell Confinement System.

Bringing Stability to an Unstable World

With this summer’s extremely wet weather conditions across the country, building access roads is a major challenge.  Muddy, soft ground is causing construction delays when it comes to moving heavy vehicles and equipment over the soft soils.

Presto’s GEOWEB® Soil Stabilization System offers a way to build roads even with these site challenges using low-cost, local fill—and has been doing so for over 30 years. In fact, the GEOWEB system is the go-to solution for many oil companies in remote areas like the Canadian oil sands and the Amazon basin. Recently, EnergyNow Media featured an article on GEOWEB roads addressing the latest access challenges in the energy sector. The EnergyNow article is republished below.


Reprint of recent article written by “EnergyNow Media” (North American Energy Magazine)

Presto Geosystems: Bringing Stability to an Unstable World

Oil and gas is a tricky business. Everything from resource extraction to site management to processing is fraught with difficulties, challenges, and trials. However, one often-overlooked aspect within this industry is that of simply being able to access the resource site in the first place. Once access is established, it’s crucial that there is a clean, stable platform to work on and transport resources back out. As anyone familiar with the industry knows, energy resources are rarely discovered in local, easily accessible areas. Rather, oil and gas drilling most often takes place in the most far-flung reaches of wilderness imaginable, where even constructing safe, reliable roads and working platforms can be a near-insurmountable challenge.

In these situations, Presto Geosystems truly excels.

Established in Appleton, Wisconsin, Presto Geosystems specializes in soil stabilization and cellular confinement technology. In 1978, Gary Bach developed the Presto Geosystems crowning achievement: the 3D geocell. Since then, Presto Geosystems has lead the way in their field, culminating with the most recent iteration of their flagship soil stabilization product: GEOWEB®, which offers the highest and longest-lasting performance of any geocell stabilization system on the civilian market today. The GEOWEB product is designed to handle the abuse from repeated heavy truck and equipment loading over some of the worst, wet soft soils.  Able to use local on-site fill – even sand – makes the 3D geocell system the quickest way to build roads and platforms in remote areas with limited aggregate resources.

“It’s critical that the weld is consistent so that you can count on the strength of these systems, and know how much load you can carry,” Presto Geosystems Director, Bill Handlos, explains. “The tensile strength of the strip is important so that it’s not too stiff, or too soft…there’s a blend that’s just right. This is what we’ve perfected.” It’s this dogged pursuit of excellence that has made the Presto Geosystems name synonymous with quality and stability when it comes to building site access roads, oil pads, work platforms, surface pipeline protection, construction mats, and much more.

In addition, Presto Geosystems works to provide project support from the very inception of an endeavour all the way up to the completion of a satisfactory installation. “We shine because we’re willing to start during the project conception and vision,” Handlos states proudly. “We do a lot of work with engineers to define the problem and give them evaluations to get them started. As (loadings) become more defined, we often refine and revise designs. We take a journey with our clients without asking for a dime. As they purchase the material, we go to the site with them to give them tips and tricks to help lay down the product faster.” It takes an incredible amount of commitment and dedication to provide so much hands-on assistance even once the product has been sold and shipped out the door, but for Presto Geosystems, that’s simply another part of day-to-day operations.

Providing outstanding levels of client support is one thing, but that doesn’t amount to much if the end product isn’t up to standard. As in all things, however, Presto Geosystems holds itself to an exceptionally high level of excellence and quality when it comes to the materials it develops and advocates for. “We’ve proven that our products work for almost four decades,” Handlos confidently states. “The fact that we invented the product speaks volumes as well. Our models are spot-on in forecasting how the product will hold up, and we have the experience and knowledge to quickly get the product in the ground.”

More than that, Presto Geosystems is made up of team members who have a profound level of respect for the environment, and encourage green practices and policies whenever they are able to. “Our most successful people are those who value the lower carbon footprint that our product creates,” Handlos tells us. “You’re using less natural resources, and saving money all around. We are the green solution, and that matters quite a bit to oil and gas companies, as they are trying to do things with as little impact as they can. We play a role there.”

Ultimately, everything circles back to the outstanding, innovative line of products and services that Presto Geosystems has created and continues to offer to the world stage. “We’re in 60 countries with our products, and are proud to offer free designs for our customers, as clients see the value in these savings,” Handlos lets us know. “We stabilize an unstable world. We are a solution when others won’t work, or are too expensive to deploy. We make it easy to design and construct. We stand behind our product. We’ve set the standards for our industry.

For more information on the pioneering services and products offered by Presto Geosystems, visit them online at www.prestogeo.com, or contact Bill Handlos at 1-800-548-3424 or [email protected].

Choosing the Right Geocell

Written By: Bryan Wedin P.E., Chief Design Engineer, Presto Geosystems

Not all geocells are created equal. While most manufacturers can provide similar-looking written specifications, you need assurances that the material delivered for your project is of the high quality that you expect. Important factors in the success of your geocell project include:

Quality

The geocell material is proven, strong, and will last

  • Require only the highest quality virgin High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) resin
    • Low quality or recycled resin can lead to weak and/or inconsistent seam strength, putting the success of your project at risk.
    • Non-HDPE materials cannot match the nearly 40 years of in-ground experience of HDPE geocells and plastic alloy proprietary blends can mask cheap stiff filler materials.
  • ISO Certification
    • Important, but the manufacturer sets the testing protocol for the certification. Require a Certificate of Analysis (COA) for the material that is shipped to your project. An ISO certification that does not require continuous testing is lacking.

Integral Components

The complete solution includes proper components

  • Non-corrosive, high-strength panel connection method (ATRA® Keys vs. weak staples or zip ties)
  • Anchors that provide secure connections to the geocell (ATRA® stakes vs. J-hooks)
  • Load Transfer Devices for tendon applications that are non-corrosive and offer a secure connection to the cell walls (ATRA® tendon clips vs. washers, knots or pipes)

Certification

The geocell material “as shipped” meets proven industry standards

  • Insist upon signed material certs showing the proper testing/certification for your application
  • Unscrupulous providers supply special material for testing and ship lower quality material

Design and Specification Support

You receive proper tools and engineering guidance

  • Require the manufacturer to provide project design assistance for their specific material. Variations of resin and of anchoring and connection methods on the market make it “critical that designs from one manufacturer not be used for alternate material.”
  • Require the manufacturer to provide a complete specification/submittal package

Installation Support

The contractor receives proper installation tools and training

  • Many contractors are not experienced in the installation of geocells. Require pre-construction training and on-site field supervision by a certified manufacturer’s representative to ensure your project is installed correctly and economically.

Certainty

Your owner and your reputation are protected

  • All of the above factors combine to provide you the level of confidence you expect from the material you specify. Why risk this certainty for the small savings (savings that come from the use of inferior resin, non-engineered components and a lack of project support) that come with allowing inferior, alternate material suppliers?

 

Bryan Wedin P.E., Chief Design Engineer, Presto Geosystems
P: (920) 738-1342
[email protected]
www.prestogeo.com

Creep Not a Factor for Geocell Load Support

An accurate understanding of creep resistance is essential to proper material selection when using polymers, and in the case of geocells, this science is being misapplied. The definition of creep deformation is the tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently under the influence of mechanical stress. Creep is something that creates fear and uncertainty with all designers where the possibility of creep factors exist. Yes, creep can occur in almost all materials including plastics, metals and concrete. In cases such as bridge and building design, it is important to properly understand creep factors and account for creep in engineering calculations. Yet, in the case of designing with geocells for load support, creep factors have no relevance.

What Causes Creep?

In order for creep to occur there must be; a constant load applied and a sustained deformation. Creep only applies when there is a sustained load on a material for an extended period. In a case of repeated on and off loading, this would be governed by fatigue and not by creep. The second required factor for creep to occur is an ability to undergo sustained deformation of the material. When a polymer has a load applied, the molecules of the material start to pull apart and stretch which leads to elongation of the material in one direction and typically a thinning of the material’s thickness.

Creep not a factor in Load Support

Now, consider a geocell load support application. The geocell material is expanded out on site and then an infill material is placed into the cells. At this point, there is not an applied load or deformation occurring in the material.  Next, the infill material is compacted. This compaction applies a load to the cells, but this load is removed as soon as the compaction equipment is no longer positioned over the cells. In addition, as an individual geocell is loaded it exerts a force (as it starts to bulge slightly) but each of the adjacent cells around it push back on it (passive resistance) and prevent any sustained deformation. Thus, at the time of compaction, there is not a constant load nor is there a sustained deformation. Thus far, the material is successfully installed without any creep effects.

 

After the geocell load support system has been installed, the two types of live loads that will affect the system are driving loads and stationary (parked) loads. When a vehicle drives over a geocell system the load is applied vertically and as the geocell distributes the load laterally there is a temporary load applied to the geocell material. The load is not a sustained load and therefore would not have a creep effect. In the case of stationary loads, the load is continually applied to the geocell so it meets the first criteria for creep. Due to the pressure from all of the adjacent cells surrounding the loaded cell(s) there is no ability for the cells to move enough to have any appreciable sustained deformation. Therefore, creep cannot effect this scenario.

ASTM D6992 Creep Test Not Applicable

Those who make claims about potential for creep in load support have cited ASTM standard methodology. ASTM standards provide an accepted means for standardizing testing to be able to directly compare products. It is important to review the intention and scope of a test to ensure that it is appropriate and will give relevant results. The Stepped Isothermal Method (SIM) is used to accelerate creep testing. ASTM D6992 uses the SIM method to predict the expected deformation of geosynthetics over time when used for reinforcement applications. This method can be effective yet it is not suitable for polyethylene geocell evaluation. ASTM D6992 5.3 Note 1 states, “Currently, SIM testing has focused mainly on woven and knitted geogrids and woven geotextiles made from polyester, aramid, polyaramid, poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) and polypropylene yarn and narrow strips.” Additionally, the note continues with a warning against expanded scope of the test saying, “Additional correlation studies on other materials are needed.” So while this test has applicability for geogrids and geotextiles, the test is not intended for evaluating geocells and correlations for polyethylene have not yet been established.

Further, D6992 cannot be considered in isolation. D6992 states, “Results of this method are to be used to augment results of Test Method D5262 and may not be used as the sole basis for determination of long term creep and creep-rupture behavior of geosynthetic material.” This reinforces the importance of reviewing each test standard to ensure that the product is within the scope of the test and that the results are relevant and complete. In the case of geocell evaluation, using ASTM D6992 is inappropriate as it has not been properly correlated to provide accurate evaluation of polyethylene and without ASTM D5262, it provides an incomplete overall evaluation of the product.

HDPE’s Long History of Success and Repeatability

HDPE has been used as the industry standard material for geocells since it was invented over 40 years ago. HDPE is a material that has been extensively researched by independent scientists throughout multiple industries which allows for a complete understanding of its performance capabilities. Using a virgin HDPE material allows for direct verification of resin consistency through laboratory testing to ensure that each manufacturing location and production lot have consistent material performance. This laboratory verification also allows for the comparison of the material to independent scientific results and not just manufacturer’s claims.

Inelastic Materials

A few geocell manufacturers are promoting a Fabricated Inelastic Blend (FIB) to cut manufacturing costs and increase material stiffness utilizing recycled and other unpublished polymer materials. These FIB based materials can vary widely, even for the same product. Due to the vast number of combinations possible with these FIB materials, they pose two key problems when included as a material choice: validation and consistency. Due to the unpublished nature of the blending mixture there is no way to validate this material in comparison with published testing. Any testing of FIB materials must start from the beginning without any experience to rely on for long-term performance.  The second concern with FIB materials is controlling consistency of the blend. Because each FIB blend is so variable, there is no way for a 3rd party tester to fully determine consistency of the blend between different manufacturing plants or even between different production lots. This inability to determine consistency creates uncertainty because there is no way to determine if there has been improper blending or changes to material blend.

Manufacturers using FIB materials promote the advantages of increased material stiffness. This stiffness is often a function of multiple generations of recycling. It is important to review the differences between elastic and inelastic materials and how they affect geocell performance. An elastic material is able to undergo a deformation (strain) and then spring back to its original state without permanent (plastic) deformation. Conversely, an inelastic material ends in catastrophic (complete) failure. Many of engineering’s worst failures have come due to catastrophic failures of inelastic materials that were loaded in unexpected ways. This absolute nature of inelastic failure puts projects at great risk because it does not give indication prior to collapse. Conversely, with elastic materials as material limits are reached the material will stretch and yield prior to complete material failure.

True HDPE Performance vs FIB Results

FIB materials bring a new uncertainty to the geocell market. These materials are of unverifiable composition so connecting material to performance is nearly impossible. Ultimately, these FIB materials beg your trust in their performance touting their unnecessary creep resistance. They hide the truth that creep resistance comes at a cost – inelastic material that can fail catastrophically.

After 40 years, HDPE continues to be the industry standard material for geocells. Presto Geosystems’ proudly pioneered the use of HDPE material in its GEOWEB Geocell products due to the well-understood performance and reliability of that material.

In the 40 years GEOWEB Geocells have been used for load support projects all around the world, there has never been a failure due to creep effects. While this consistency of performance may sound very impressive, it should not be surprising because creep forces simply do not matter in these applications.

A Simple Question

How long does it take to install? It is a question we hear every day. When it comes to cost and installation rates for geosynthetic construction products, there are no simple answers to what seems like simple questions.simple questions

In fact, beware of those who try to simplify determination of installation costs for their products with quick answers or charts and tables to determine construction rates. Experienced project managers and site supervisors of the crews charged with installation are in the best position to estimate productivity rates. They know best their crew’s capability and the characteristics of the site involved.

The variables that need to be considered include:

  • Crew size, talent, work ethic and workday length
  • Temperature, precipitation and length of day (sunlight)
  • Experience with product class
  • Size of the project
  • Site Access
  • Site Conditions (see weather)

Crew

The optimum crew size is important. Too small and you may lose the benefits of assembly line productivity. Too large and you will find that you fall over each other and pay for extra “inspectors”. All crews are not created equally. The familiarity with tools and techniques vary greatly as does the work ethic both between crews and by region and country.

Weather

Cold temperature can slow down project installation rates, due to need for heavy clothes and gloves and can even affect the way materials go together. In some cases, frozen ground can aid installation on soil stabilization rates by allowing firm surfaces on which to work. Extremely hot weather can also negatively impact productivity rates. Rain never helps and even recent rain can change a site condition to make working estimates degrade. Sunshine is short in northern climates and visibility can shorten the workday in winter. Delays in projects that push a project start date by months can add days to a schedule as daylight and conditions change by season.

Experience With Product Class

Installation rates do not include training time. Industry leading manufacturers offer trained installation representatives and tools that can help shorten learning curves and get installation efficiency off to a quick start. Size of the Project.

Large sites lead to higher efficiency and greater installation rates. Invariably, installation expertise only matters if the installation duration > learning curve duration. Large projects also offer opportunities to stage work, use multiple crews, and create repetitive motion improvements.

Site Access and Site Conditions

Not only is close proximity to the roadway important, but one must consider the benefits of multiple access points if available. Location of material storage can create long sub delivery times within a single site. Long narrow sites can be a challenge as leap frogging workers is not practical and may force linear progression.

So, when we are asked what installation rates can be expected for Presto Geosystems® GEOWEB® road, slope or retaining wall solutions; or when we are asked about the time to assemble our GEOBLOCK® or GEOPAVE® porous paving systems; or when a customer wants to know how long to assemble a GEOTERRA® construction mats; expect the questions to start….Just a few simple questions.

Our experts are here to help answer your geosynthetics questions. Meet the Presto Geosystems team >>

Impervious Gravel vs. Porous Aggregate Paving Systems

Written by William G. Handlos, P.E.

For two decades, I held the position of City Engineer and frequently had to explain to disbelieving homeowners, developers and elected officials – that gravel driveways and parking lots were not porous. I would explain that for purposes of stormwater runoff, such gravel pavements must be treated exactly as we would concrete and asphaltic pavements. They often bristled at the idea that gravel did not percolate water and were upset to find that their gravel driveway, lots and roadways were assumed to shed 100% of rainwater.

So it is with more than a dose of irony that I now have found myself in the position of regularly explaining to local and state officials that aggregate pavements are not necessarily impervious. Stakeholders are so accustomed to repeating the impervious gravel mantra…that they forget to notice that porous aggregate is not the same thing as gravel. I think it is best to start with a primer on the vernacular.

Good Gravel and Good Porous Aggregate

A “good” gravel (Image 1) should have 40 to 70% stone, well-graded from 1/4” to 2-1/2” diameter; 20 to 50% sand; and 10% +/- fines. It should resist abrasion, shed water and be capable of being compacted.

A “good” porous aggregate (Image 2) should be poorly-graded from 3/8” to ¾” diameter; with 25 to 40% porosity. It should pass the heaviest of rainfall, is easily rutted/shoved and nearly impossible to suitably compact. Such good porous aggregate is often called open-graded base course (OBGC) when used under pavements.

Some municipal and state regulations continue to deem aggregate surfaces as impervious. This is due to inertia and old school thinking and it is past time to change these outdated standards. With the help of engineered high density polyethylene containment products, such as the GEOPAVE® porous paving system, OBGC porous aggregate can be stabilized to offer a highly porous, strong, abrasion resistant, rut proof, aesthetically pleasing and inexpensive alternative to porous asphalt or pervious concrete.

Injection molded and designed specifically for use with open aggregate designs, this system confines the otherwise unruly OGBC to individual cells with an attractive herringbone wall pattern that is designed to be seen and is reminiscent of a paver system. Resistant to frost heave when placed over an OGBC base for storage or sandy soils for fast infiltration, the system gives a very low cost alternative that is highly sought after by those municipalities seeking to meet demanding stormwater goals.

GeoPave® Porous Pavement System

Check to see if your local or state regulations allow for Porous Aggregate Systems and, if not; send a note to [email protected] with your location, the regulation, and a contact at the agency. We will follow up on all requests personally.

Porous Pavement Systems in Extreme Weather

Porous Pavements

Customers are always coming up with new applications for our GEOBLOCK® Turf Protection System, but the University of Wisconsin-Madison just took it to another level. In early 2014, their Space Science and Engineering Center purchased the GEOBLOCK® Pavers to aid in staging their ice coring drills in Greenland and Antarctica.

The GEOBLOCK System was utilized for two specific applications.

The first application was for a footer under the frame of the drill tent(s). This application allowed the weight of the drill tent building to be distributed across the snow’s surface and provide support. Due to the GEOBLOCK System’s rigid design and load transfer tabs, the same characteristics that make it a strong, durable turf protection system, also delivered value over snow.

GeoBlock® Porous Pavement System

In the second application, the GEOBLOCK Units served as a flooring system inside the drill tent. Researchers liked the grid surface as it provided a non-skid surface and easy installation at sub-zero temperatures (-40°F). The rigid design also wasn’t affected by on-site drilling fluids (due to the non-reactive and inert polyethylene construction).

The GeoBlock® Porous Pavement System Works With A Variety of Infills

Researchers also capitalized on the light-weight design and reusability. The remote location required air-lifting the material and hand construction. The GEOBLOCK® system proved it can deliver results, even in the most extreme conditions.

Learn more about the GEOBLOCK Pavers >>

Request a Quote >>